Quick description: the team rating (point diff.) column is just a basic team strength metric adjusted for the schedule, including back-to-back games. It's very similar to SRS. Strength variance is the degree to which a team's strength rating varies based on how good the opponent is. I've provided two columns to illustrate this: a team's rating versus a +3 team, which is a typical playoff team and one near 50 wins, and what a team's rating would be versus a +6 team, which is a strong contender as most title-winners are near +6 or over. Since the metric needs to be tested over multiple years still, I sorted teams by their strength versus +3 teams because it's a more conservative estimate of how good they are against competitive playoff teams.
Team
|
Team rating (point diff.)
|
Strength variance
|
Team rating versus +3 team
|
Team rating versus +6 team
|
Los Angeles Clippers
|
7.27
|
0.15
|
7.90
|
8.53
|
Oklahoma City Thunder
|
6.60
|
0.31
|
7.68
|
8.76
|
San Antonio Spurs
|
8.01
|
-0.44
|
6.87
|
5.72
|
Houston Rockets
|
5.08
|
-0.02
|
5.20
|
5.31
|
Golden State Warriors
|
5.11
|
-0.17
|
4.78
|
4.45
|
Portland Trail Blazers
|
4.37
|
-0.24
|
3.83
|
3.28
|
Miami Heat
|
4.14
|
-0.18
|
3.77
|
3.41
|
Dallas Mavericks
|
2.93
|
0.13
|
3.49
|
4.05
|
Indiana Pacers
|
3.66
|
-0.15
|
3.37
|
3.09
|
Phoenix Suns
|
3.05
|
-0.04
|
3.11
|
3.16
|
Toronto Raptors
|
2.53
|
0.09
|
2.95
|
3.37
|
Minnesota Timberwolves
|
3.03
|
-0.19
|
2.62
|
2.21
|
Memphis Grizzlies
|
2.15
|
-0.09
|
2.05
|
1.95
|
Chicago Bulls
|
1.13
|
0.08
|
1.53
|
1.92
|
New York Knicks
|
-1.37
|
0.47
|
0.22
|
1.81
|
Washington Wizards
|
0.49
|
-0.45
|
-0.70
|
-1.88
|
Brooklyn Nets
|
-1.57
|
0.09
|
-1.13
|
-0.70
|
Atlanta Hawks
|
-0.84
|
-0.31
|
-1.62
|
-2.40
|
Denver Nuggets
|
-1.43
|
-0.15
|
-1.71
|
-1.98
|
New Orleans Pelicans
|
-2.03
|
-0.05
|
-2.00
|
-1.97
|
Detroit Pistons
|
-4.11
|
0.57
|
-2.23
|
-0.36
|
Sacramento Kings
|
-2.09
|
-0.10
|
-2.23
|
-2.38
|
Charlotte Bobcats
|
-0.92
|
-0.63
|
-2.67
|
-4.41
|
Cleveland Cavaliers
|
-3.83
|
-0.10
|
-3.97
|
-4.12
|
Boston Celtics
|
-4.90
|
0.03
|
-4.66
|
-4.42
|
Orlando Magic
|
-5.86
|
0.24
|
-4.97
|
-4.08
|
Los Angeles Lakers
|
-5.30
|
-0.43
|
-6.43
|
-7.56
|
Utah Jazz
|
-6.23
|
-0.38
|
-7.20
|
-8.17
|
Milwaukee Bucks
|
-8.42
|
0.31
|
-7.34
|
-6.26
|
Philadelphia 76ers
|
-10.66
|
-0.37
|
-11.62
|
-12.57
|
I would really like to see an analysis of Russell Westbrook from an on-court, off-court standpoint. Essentially, can you do what you did with Boozer and Calderon with Westbrook? Great work, as always!
ReplyDeleteGreat work, Justin.
ReplyDeleteThis is valuable information to look at. I second your view that people are sleeping on LAC but they are facing an extremely difficult road to the NBA Finals.
I made a thread on this on realgm: http://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=344&t=1316294
The hardest road to the NBA Finals since 1990 is the 01 Lakers who faced opposition with an average SRS of 6.17.
The potential road for LAC is far harder. If they land OKC and SAS in addition to GSW they will be facing an average competition of 6.60 with two of those series on the road. That is simply brutal competition. Even if they are the best team in the NBA they'll likely lose one of those series.
_________________________
One issue to keep in mind is sample size. You're dealing with an awful small sample size when you're talking +6 teams. There are only three of them so you're dealing with an awful small sample size.
No, it probably wasn't clear: I look at how every single team does versus the effect of increasing opponent strength. So how a team does versus a +6 one is an estimate based on a linear model of all the other teams. I don't only look at how a team does versus teams at +6 or higher.
Delete