Showing posts with label blazers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label blazers. Show all posts

Thursday, December 19, 2013

Portland, Indiana, and the Skewed Perception of Supporting Casts

Even after both teams lost last night, the Pacers and Blazers have two of the four best records in the league. ESPN's forecast gave Indiana a modest improvement to 54 wins from 49 last season, while the forecast also saw a five game improvement for Portland but that still landed them at only 38 wins. Yet the Pacers have destroyed their competition this season with Miami needing a few iffy calls and foul trouble for Hibbert to pull out a slim victory at home, and Portland is almost on pace to double their wins from last season. What happened? What was missed?

Legends are often compared to each other by their team success relative to their supporting casts -- Olajuwon won without another star while David Robinson had to wait for Duncan. Unfortunately, this is a messy and inaccurate method. If we can't judge how valuable the legends are and have to resort to a weird team success method, how can we be able to judge an entire supporting cast of six to nine rotation players? Not only that, but playing style and coaching can drastically alter a team's course.

Looking at Portland's additions, there's nothing to suggest a +20 win improvement. They added Robin Lopez, Mo Williams, Dorell Wright, Thomas Robinson, and CJ McCollum, who hasn't even played. Given the massive change in the effectiveness of the team, one would think Robin Lopez is the next Shaquille O'Neal. But the origin here for how teams improve (the starting point: who the new guys replace) is not the same in every case. The Blazers bench was one of the worst of all-time. For instance, ESPN writer Kevin Pelton ranked them second worst ever in terms of how many wins the bench (defined as everyone except the five most common starters) produced using his WARP metric behind only the 1999 Bulls. They shot under 40% and scored the third fewest points in the last 15 years -- and it's not like they were out there for their defense.

When working relative to that point, just adding league average players can make a large difference. Though there's another factor with the Blazers: they used JJ Hickson as the starting center, and it was a disaster on the interior defense. Hickson is barely big enough for a power forward, much less a center. He's also probably the most overrated player by his box score stats. It's been years including multiple teams and sets of teammates, and advanced forms of adjusted plus/minus continue to find as a Hickson a net negative player. So you have a player with empty double doubles playing out of position with the next best option being the disappointing rookie Meyers Leonard -- how were we supposed to know how effective the Lillard-Matthews-Batum-Aldridge core was without a competent center?

In fact, going by scoring margin, the disparity between the starters and the rest of the team last season wasn't as large as one would think. Using NBAWOWY.com, the net rating of the starters was a mediocre -0.9, while all other lineups were -4.5. However, this is largely due to Hickson. Looking at all lineups with only Lillard, Wesley Matthews, Batum, and Aldridge, the team was +1.8, while all other lineups were -6.5. In replacing players who dragged the team down along with the sort of natural improvement you'd assume from a young core including a rookie point guard, it's not entirely shocking the Blazers are a good team. It was just so hard to see that with one of the worst sets of benches and centers ever.

Season
Team
Players.......................................
Net rating
Net rating (all other lineups)
+Difference
2013
POR
Lillard-Wes-Batum-LA-Hickson
-0.9
-4.5
3.6
2013
POR
Lillard-Wes-Batum-LA
1.8
-6.5
8.3
2014
POR
Lillard-Wes-Batum-LA-Lopez
9.1
6.4
2.7

The Pacers, meanwhile, held onto their starters while shuffling their bench. Again, their additions are not world-changing: Luis Scola, CJ Watson, Orlando Johnson, Solomon Hill, and Chris Copeland. What's remarkable is that Danny Granger has not played, and he was the driving reason for most of the improvement seen in the projection of the team's season. A reasonable person would not say those players are good enough to turn a good team into an elite one, but that's exactly what's happening. It's not just the improvement of Hibbert and Paul George (one counter is David West has actually been worse this season); the bench is vastly more effective. Last season, the difference between the starters and all other lineups was enormous: roughly the same difference between the '96 Bulls and the '96 Timberwolves. Their starting lineup is as good as any lineup for a contender, and with a decent bench that pushes them into the NBA's stratosphere.

Season
Team
Players........................................
Net rating
Net rating (all other lineups)
+Difference
2013
IND
Hill-Lance St.-George-West-Roy
13.8
-4.8
18.6
2014
IND
Hill-Lance St.-George-West-Roy
14.6
4.4
10.2

After no major personnel changes, two small market teams are consuming wins at a ferocious pace. This is evidence that we have little understanding of how valuable supporting casts are. If you want to judge Lebron and Dirk by what they achieved when they were "solo," remember that the bench is more difficult to judge than the star player, and all it takes is a bad bench or a misplaced starter to keep a team from piling up wins. Going just by year-to-year changes, one would think Robin Lopez and Luis Scola are all-star players, but we're missing all the details: staring at a single Douglas fir and missing the forest.

Sunday, March 18, 2012

Blazers' 2012 Draft

Since the Blazers given up on the season and traded their second best player for a draft pick, the rest of a season is about going through the motions before the lottery draft. Every NBA fan knows about tanking even if the league won't do anything to stop it (see one solution here.)

The lottery draft is surprisngly complicated, but here's one of the most important parts: the first four lottery spots are picked randomly where the worst records get more odds. After that, draft spots are in order of worst record.

The Blazers have their own first round pick, which right now is slotted for 12th. They may drop to 10 or 9, but anything more is not likely given how far we are into the season and how close the Blazers are to .500. The New Jersey pick is top three protected, but Charlotte, Washington, and New Orleans are a lock for the three worst records. However, New Jersey still has decent odds to land in the top three because the first four are picked by the lottery. Right now they have the fourth worst record, barely possessing a worst record than Detroit, Toronto, and Sacramento. Hollinger's playoff odds tool has New Jersey finishing 24-42, tied for fifth with five other teams. The Blazers could get a New Jersey pick anywhere from 4th to 8th, and their own from 9th to 13th. Luckily for Portland, this is a deep draft.

Each potential lottery pick who could be taken fourth to fourteenth is shown below. The order is determined by an average lottery draft rating from two sites, ESPN and DraftExpress. Included are important facts like height and stats, which are mainly given in per 40 minute, pace adjusted form to compare players on the same scale (a fast team inflates a player's stats, and playing small minutes destroys one's per game averages.)

Andre Drummond
5 (6th ESPN, 4th DraftExpress) 

Center
Connecticut, Freshman
Birthday: Aug. 10, 1993
6' 11", 7' 5", 275 lbs

Andre has slipped in recent months when before he was projected as the top one or two overall pick because as a college freshmen he has struggled converting his considerable athletic gifts into basketball. However, he's been advertised as a great passer for a big man, and even in college he plays more of a finesse game. You couldn't see this in his stats, unfortuately, because of his low assist to turnover ratio, and he doesn't have a consistent outside shot. His free throw shooting in particular is abhorrent. He's even worst than Ben Wallace at this point, and only DeAndre Jordan and Andris Biedrins in the NBA have shot as poorly. However, even they are excellent finishers inside, scoring off dunks and close attempts, while Drummond has a decent percentage from the field but nothing as spectacular as you'd like from a center high in the lottery.

A common comparison that falls flat is Amare Stoudemire 2.0, as I don't think he'll ever be the finisher that Amare is. Drummond appears to be more like the next DeAndre Jordan; consequently, he's fallen a few spots in the mock drafts. In dunk contests he's showed off with amazing dunks; you can see that leaping ability in his high number of blocks. He has the body and athleticism for an elite NBA center, but none of the skills. He's the typical high risk, high reward player, and the Blazers will have to study his work ethic and character to see if he can transform the potential into production. They should not take him as a "need" for their future center.

Per 40 minutes pace adjusted stats:
14.5 points, 11.2 rebounds, 0.7 assists, 1.2 steals, 3.8 blocks, 2.4 turnovers.

Percentages and efficiency:
51 TS%, 0 3PT%, 31.3 FT%, 21.8 PER.

Stats found here.




Bradley Beal

5.5 (4th ESPN, 7th DraftExpress):
Shooting Guard
Florida, Freshman
Birthday: June 28, 1993
6' 4", 6' 8" wingspan, 195 lbs

Beal was advertised as a great shooter with deep range, although his three point percentage was low. He's a little short for his position, but has a decent wingspan so I suspect he won't have a big problem defending at the position. He's reminiscent of Eric Gordon -- maybe a little short for his position, but he is an above average defender and a good outside shooter who can generate free throws. All that said, I'm not sure why he's slotted to go so high in the draft because he's not overwhelmingly good in any respect.

While Beal's three point percentage was low, draft experts do not expect that trend to continue, and his two-point percentage is 52. He doesn't have elite athleticism, but it's not bad either. Again, this is a player who's good in many categories like ball-handling but nothing spectacular. It's easy to picture him an NBA rotation player, but not as a star player.

Per 40 minutes pace adjusted stats:
17.0 points, 7.6 rebounds, 2.4 assists, 1.6 steals, 1.0 blocks, 2.5 turnovers.

Percentages and efficiency:
56 TS%, 31.9 3PT%, 77.5 FT%, 20.7 PER.

Stats found here.



Harrison Barnes
5.5 (5th ESPN, 6th DraftExpress)
Small forward
North Carolina, Sophomore
Birthday: May 30, 1992
6' 8", 6' 11", 210 lbs

Barnes has the ideal small forward body similar to Luol Deng or Rudy Gay. One measurement has him at 6' 8", while another at 6' 9" with shoes (NBA players typically use their height with shoes.) Given his wingspan, he has more than enough size to play the 3 in the NBA, and could be used in small-ball lineups as a power forward. He's rail-thin, though not extremely so, but basketball is a game for long, skinny athletes. He might have trouble with the bench press in the pre-draft camp, but ignore that entirely because it has nothing to do with the sport. Instead focus on his scoring skill and defensive potential -- he can score from anywhere on the court with an adept midrange game and three point range, and is already defending well.

There are few negatives to be found for Barnes. He's not the most athletic player in the draft, but he's still above average. By all accounts, he is very coachable and possesses a strong drive to improve. He's a sophomore, but so are many of his lottery peers as the lockout gave them more incentive to stay another year. He produced well as a freshman, but he also improved in his second year. Compared to the other prospects, he has a low variance (i.e. risk) on what you'd expect of him in the NBA. Unfortunately, the Blazers are rebuilding around Aldridge, a power forward, and Batum, a small forward.

Per 40 minutes pace adjusted stats:
22.2 points, 6.6 rebounds, 0.7 assists, 1.3 steals, 0.4 blocks, 2.4 turnovers.

Percentages and efficiency:
54 TS%, 37.7 3PT%, 72.4 FT%, 22.6 PER.

Stats found here.


Jared Sullinger
7 (9th ESPN, 5th DraftExpress)
Power forward/center
Ohio State, Sophomore
Birthday: March 4th, 1992
6' 9", 7' 2", 280 lbs

One of the first questions you hear about Sullinger is if he's big enough for a power forward, and especially a center. His height is usually cited, and sometimes people will say 6' 9" is just under the ideal height. Ignore those people -- you don't play basketball with the top of your head; you play with your hands. Sullinger has a large wingspan, making him more than qualified for power forward, and at his weight and strength you're not going to push him out of the paint easily. Long-term, I see him playing center for long stretches because his strength and wingspan are adequate, but also because his quickness is subpar in defending NBA power forwards, which will become a worse problem as he ages.

Let's ignore his size for a second -- what matters is his ability to play basketball, and he's fantastic. He's a great rebounder, and a phenomenal scoring big man with a developed post-game and range that extends to the college three point line. The son of a coach, he has a knack for scoring inside and draws fouls at a high rate. He's not exactly a rim protector, but his steals and blocks are high enough to prove that he's not over-matched. If he keeps the weight off, I could easily see him as an all-star power forward. Lost in the amazing Anthony Davis season is how well Sullinger has been playing. For the Blazers this creates a tough choice. Do you go with need or best available? Sullinger's talent is enough for a top three pick, much less six. His rebounding and strength could work well next to Aldridge, but neither can protect the rim. Drafting by just need is problematic because you're more likely to draft someone who can't even play in the league, and at that point it's much better to draft a prospect like Sullinger, a skilled big man who can score often and with great efficiency.

Per 40 minutes pace adjusted stats:
23.0 points, 12.2 rebounds, 1.6 assists, 1.6 steals, 1.2 blocks, 2.7 turnovers.

Percentages and efficiency:
61 TS%, 38.7 3PT%, 76.3 FT%, 30.7 PER.

Stats found here.


Perry Jones
8 (8th ESPN, 8th DraftExpress)
Power forward
Baylor, Sophomore
Birthday: Sep. 24, 1991
6' 11", 7' 2.5" wingspan, 235 lbs

In a draft littered by power forwards, Perry Jones is the athletic 6' 11" guy who can run the floor and competent in most areas of basketball though not dominant in anything. He's tall enough coupled with long arms to defend power forwards, and even centers, but his strength and quickness will probably force his role as a power forward. He's fluid even when dribbling, and he can jump with an ease not found in most guys his size.

Despite all those gifts, he has yet to produce at an elite level, not even averaging a block a game. The fear is that he's the next Anthony Randolph, an intriguing prospect who's athletic with a well-rounded skillset but has yet to put it all together. That's a better excuse if you're a freshman trying to adjust to a new game, but Jones is a sophomore and has barely improved. The bottom line for the Blazers is that a 6' 11" forward who's a middling rebounder with shockingly few blocked shots is not the ideal frontcourt partner for Aldridge.

Per 40 minutes pace adjusted stats:
17.8 points, 9.9 rebounds, 1.6 assists, 1.2 steals, 0.8 blocks, 2.2 turnovers.

Percentages and efficiency:
54 TS%, 29 3PT%, 71.0 FT%, 22.2 PER.

Stats found here.



Tyler Zeller
10.5 (11th ESPN, 10th DraftExpress)
Position: Center
North Carolina, Senior
Birthday: Jan. 17, 1990
7' 0", unknown wingspan, 250 lbs

On the other end of the frontcourt prospect spectrum from athletic, raw power forwards is Tyler Zeller, the rare senior lottery pick who's also a seven-foot center. Tyler, not be confused with his younger brother Cody, is a highly skilled big man, shooting better from the foul line than most of the lottery wingman in the draft with good rebounding and shotblocking. His skills on the line also correlate to his jumper with range out to 18 feet. However, he's a senior, and there's a reason NBA management reflexively discriminate against those players. He's 22 and what he's doing now (obviously) shouldn't be compared to the freshmen and sophomores. Look what he did as a freshman: 7.8 minutes, 47% from the field, and 1.3 fouls (over six per 40 minutes.)

Tyler has improved his game to the point that teams in the 9 to 12 range are seriously considering him. No one's predicting stardom, but at that draft position a quality backup center or even a decent starter is a good find. He's mobile for a guy his size with an ability to catch and shoot in traffic, but his athleticism and jumping are below average for an NBA center. Few seniors become important players in the league, but at a certain point in the draft after the guys with star potential are gone Tyler is probably not a bad choice. That's not enough reason for the Blazers to submarine the season, but drafting around 10 that's what you have to expect.

Per 40 minutes pace adjusted stats:
21.6 points, 12.2 rebounds, 1.3 assists, 1.3 steals, 3.7 blocks, 2.4 turnovers.

Percentages and efficiency:
62 TS%, 0 3PT%, 80.9 FT%, 30.4 PER

Stats found here.



John Henson
11.5 (14th ESPN, 9th DraftExpress)
Power forward
North Carolina, Junior
Birthday: Dec 28, 1990
6' 10", unknown but well above average wingspan, 210 lbs

Similar to Anthony Davis, John Henson grew half a foot when he was a senior in high school, meaning he had already developed perimeter skills before he had NBA power forward size and hasn't had as much time to learn how to play in his "new" body as others. He's a fantastic shot-blocker (but of course not as good as Davis though also rarely fouling at 1.6 a game) and even put up better stats in that department last year at 4.4 a game per 40 minutes, pace adjusted. He can also rebound well, and if not for his lack of strength he would be an ideal frontcourt partner for Aldridge.

The 2012 draft is different than most because of the lack of freshmen, but many of those sophomores would have likely declared last year if it weren't for the looming threat of the recent lockout. Henson, however, is a junior, and it's usually smart to flag players who spend a while in college because if they were clear NBA caliber players they would have already jumped ship. Henson is yet another raw big man prospect, barely hitting over 50% of his free throws. He's already 21 years old and "raw" shouldn't be used so much in his descriptions. Additionally, he shoots poorly from the field with a TS% (field goal % adjusted for three's and free throws) below average, especially for a power forward who scores inside. On defense he can produce in the NBA, but his offense may never be better than well below average, hurting his overall impact as a player.

Per 40 minutes pace adjusted stats:
17.3 points, 12.7 rebounds, 1.6 assists, 0.7 steals, 3.7 blocks, 1.6 turnovers.

Percentages and efficiency:
51 TS%, 0 3PT%, 50.8 FT%, 25.4 PER.

Stats found here.


Jeremy Lamb
12 (12th ESPN, 12th DraftExpress)
Shooting guard
Connecticut, Sophomore
Birthday: May 30, 1992
6' 5", 7' 0" wingspan, 185 lbs

Where Lamb stands out is his wingspan since shooting guards rarely have a wingspan of seven-feet. Dwyane Wade's, for instance, is 6' 10.75". Wade is actually a good example for Lamb even if he wasn't a good shooter. No one thought Wade was going to be a star, and many pointed to his below average height. But as I've said in the other profiles height alone is not important. Lamb is big enough his position in the NBA, and his ridiculously long arms will help him contest others and shoot over the defense.

Incidentally, his shooting is underrated. He's at over 80 from the line, and while his three point percentage this season is low as a freshman he was at 37% with over four attempts a game last season. The most impressive stat for a player known for his midrange game is that he's 60% from 2-point range, which very few shooting guards do even in college. He's athletic, he can shoot, he's playing big minutes for a top team, there's great defensive potential, and he has freaky long arms. Why is he only 12th? The Blazers have needs at every non-forward position, and Lamb also appears to be a better prospect than others in this range.

Per 40 minutes pace adjusted stats:
19.4 points, 5.3 rebounds, 1.9 assists, 1.5 steals, 0.7 blocks, 2.2 turnovers.

Percentages and efficiency:
59 TS%, 32.8 3PT%, 82.6 FT%, 22.0 PER.

Stats found here.


Damian Lillard
13 (13 ESPN, 13 DraftExpress)
Point guard
Weber State, Junior (though really a senior because he got a medical redshirt his third year)
Birthday: July 15, 1990
6' 2", unknown wingspan, 185 lbs

After a number of young successful point guards in the league, there's finally a draft low on talent for the position. Lillard is the only point guard slated to go in the lottery. You'll hear him described as a junior, but really think of him as a senior because that's how old he is. Regardless of his age and knowledge of rotary phones, he scored 24.4 points a game with remarkable efficiency, and had good numbers in his sophomore year too. He's been close to 40% in each of his full seasons, and his free throw shooting started in the low 80's and approached 90 by his last year. He has enough size to release his shot, and enough quickness to get open as well.

One thing Lillard can't do well, however, is pass and run an offense. He's a scoring point guard, and drafting him on the idea that he'll net your team eight assists a game in the traditional role is not wise. The modern league has seen lots of success from scoring point guards and Damien shouldn't fall because of it. The injury that ended his third season also isn't as large a red flag as one would think since it seemed more like a freak play (broken foot) than a sign of things to come. While teams are wary of Damian because of his college, Weber State, and how old he is compared to others, he was second in the nation in both scoring and PER. At 13 that's not a risk; it's a safe bet.

Per 40 minutes pace adjusted stats:
28.1 points, 5.8 rebounds, 4.6 assists, 1.7 steals, 0.3 blocks, 2.6 turnovers.

Percentages and efficiency:
64 TS%, 42.5 3PT%, 88.3 FT%, 34.6 PER.

Stats found here.


Terrence Jones
13.5 (16th ESPN, 11th DraftExpress)
Small forward/power forward
College, Year
Birthday: Jan. 9, 1992
6' 8", 7' 3" wingspan, 244 lbs

A native to Portland, Oregon, Jones is a combo forward whose super long arms allow him to play power forward when necessary. He's a well-rounded forward -- an able passer, great ball handler, steal, block shots, and rebound. As for the negatives, his outside shot is inconsistent and could use some work, which is the same issue on his free throw shot. He came back for his sophomore season, but so did virtually everyone else, and his freshman season was arguably better. It's not rare for players to have an inferior sophomore season, and it's also not much of a cause for concern. In fact, showing that he produced at an earlier age is even better.

As for Jones' long-term position, he appears to be destined as a tweener, but he could also make it work. He's quick enough for most small forwards, and big enough for most power forwards. A bench role would probably suit him best when his team can pick the match-ups like Thaddeus Young on the 76ers. His wingspan should not be overlooked. It allows him to cover much taller players. On a team with Aldridge and Batum there doesn't seem to be a lot of need for a forward, but late in the lottery a quality bench player who can cover two positions is a good value.

Per 40 minutes pace adjusted stats:
17.4 points, 9.7 rebounds, 1.7 assists, 1.8 steals, 2.5 blocks, 2.4 turnovers.

Percentages and efficiency:
55 TS%, 33.3 3PT%, 65.2 FT%, 24.8 PER.

Stats found here.



Cody Zeller

14 (10th ESPN, 18th DraftExpress)
Center
Indiana, Year
Birthday: Oct. 5, 1992
6' 11", 6' 8" wingspan (DraftExpress), 210 lbs

The other and younger Zeller brother, Cody's stock has sank while his brother Tyler's ascended. There are a few logical reasons to this looking at their production, but there's a common theme among basketball families -- the youngest players are usually the best. This is because they get to play against tougher competition when growing up (their older brothers or other relatives). Tyler was better this season, but I doubt Cody at the same age would be worse. The older brother as a freshman played poorly in limited minutes; the younger brother has excelled at scoring on a good team.

Like his brother, Cody's a skilled and mobile big man who can pass decently and shoot from the line well. He's arguably the second most productive freshman, but as a center there are a handful of troublesome notes. One is that his wingspan was measured at 6' 8", and if you see the pattern from other basketball players that is not a good sign. You need long arms to shoot over players and contest shots. He's also only 210 pounds (though some sites list him at 230 now) without great athleticism, and his rebounding and shotblocking stats are below average for a prospect. I don't see how he can be a full-time center in the league unless he's grown or his wingspan is inaccurate. Nonetheless, a freshman frontcourt player who can score like that is rarely a risk. I'm surprised to see his brother ranked above him in some mock drafts.

Per 40 minutes pace adjusted stats:
21.7 points, 8.9 rebounds, 1.6 assists, 1.8 steals, 1.7 blocks, 2.2 turnovers.

Percentages and efficiency:
67 TS%, 0 3PT%, 75.5 FT%, 31.2 PER.


http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Cody-Zeller-6241/


Here's the short version -- it's a deep draft with lots of sophomores who were too scared to declare last year before a lockout. Unfortunately, a great number of the prospects are power forward, and the Blazers are locked into a good deal with their own all-star power forward. However, drafting purely by need leads to bad decisions and busts. Jared Sullinger appears (at least to me) to be the best player outside of the top three where the New Jersey pick could be placed. Andre Drummond is the pick for high stakes gamblers. He could be a bust because of his poor college play or he could be an all-star center because of the rarity of possessing both great size and amazing athleticism. No one is sure what he'll do in the pro's.

The Blazers also have their own pick for the late part of the lottery. For that one, Jeremy Lamb looks like the best value, a shooting guard who can definitely shoot with crazy long arms. There's also a scoring point guard, Damian Lillard, and a number of intriguing frontcourt players like Cody Zeller and Henson.

A good draft can change a team forever. Everyone knows the Blazers for whiffing on not one, not two, but three first overall picks for centers (LaRue Martin, Sam Bowie, and Greg Oden.) By contrast, in 2006 on draft day they traded new picks Tyrus Thomas and Randy Foye for Aldridge and Roy, respectively. Roy's abrupt retirement may have been bad fortune for the franchise, but a short prime from him is better than Foye's entire career. It was a weak draft, but they got the most out of it. For the future of Portland, they're hoping to do the same again.

Statistics taken from draftexpress.com on March 18th, 2012. Height, weight, and wingspan from ESPN. 

Thursday, February 2, 2012

Steve Nash: Discount Price for a Hall of Fame Point Guard

An aging team needs to know when to let go.

Steve Nash, arguably the greatest shooter of all time, is at the end of his contract for the Phoenix Suns, the team from which he rose to prominence from the desert. His team terrorized the league with its fast-break offense and deadly pick and roll combo with him and Amare, they won 50 plus games year after year despite injuries, he won back-to-back NBA titles, but he never got that elusive title.

All are gone -- the coach and part architect, D'Antoni, to the Knicks; Amare Stoudemire is there as well; Barbosa is playing in Canada, Joe Johnson became a perennial all-star in Atlanta; Diaw out of shape and playing for the miserable Bobcats; Marion won a title as a role player for the Mavericks, Nash's former haunt; Raja Bell is starting for the surprising Jazz; and the only guy of note left is Grant Hill, who came to the Suns at the end of their run. Nash, being the nice guy that he is, refuses to demand a trade and insult his teammates. Consequently, Phoenix management, reluctant to betray their fans by getting rid of the face of the franchise, are holding on to a 37 year old star player on an expiring contract. It doesn't have to be this way, and it's better for both Nash and Phoenix to move on.

The Suns have a strange mix of veterans and rebuilding pieces. There is no question they're out of contention and would be next year as well when Nash's contract ends. Amare and his former coach in New York with the point guard position wide open, and it's likely he'll flee there or possibly Dallas, where the even older Kidd appears to be on his last legs and his German friend Nowitzki resides. Even with his love of Phoenix, there's little chance he'll resign with the team.

The best decision from any objective view is to trade Nash while you still can and receive something of value back to rebuild, preferably a good young player and a draft pick. Since he's only signed for this season and many assume he'll flee to New York this summer, Nash is essentially a veteran rental to a contending team looking to roll the dice and win now, or at least put up an interesting season.


Another likely scenario, unfortunately, is Nash resigning with the Suns and keeping the thin cast winning more games than they should but just good enough to be out of contention for a transformative top pick. This is what the owner Sarver wants, and it's breathtaking how terrible some NBA owners are. These guys have usually made a fortune in business, yet most seem unable to grasp the basics of how to run an organization. Sarver doesn't want to suffer through a rebuilding period, but what does he think will happen if he doesn't rebuild?

Looking at the teams fighting for playoff spots, the ones in need of a point guard or distributor are Portland, the LA Lakers, Dallas, Indiana, and Miami. I'm sure other teams would want him, but those are the main ones. The Lakers are the first team to cross off the list. What do they have of value? Bynum is off the table, Josh McRoberts is a good bench player, but they have no cap space or expiring contracts large enough to match Steve Nash's. Miami is in the same position. Mario Chalmers or Cole are not worth their franchise guy.

Indiana is the first team that makes sense. Although they have Darren Collison, he's a shoot first point guard and the Pacers are one of the worst passing teams in the league. They're also fighting for a top four playoff spot and have a rising star in Paul George who's a natural small forward, a spot former all-star Danny Granger already inhabits. Luckily, Nash's contract at $11.7 million is close to Granger's at $12.0 million for two years after this season. Maybe the Pacers would be reluctant giving up a valuable player for a one year rental, but they could also have valuable wing Jared Dudley, one of those high character guys teams love who can defend and hit from outside. Indiana has cap space and could absorb the contract sending out a draft pick to Phoenix or include another player, although I doubt they could get anything better than Granger.  Additionally, the Pacers wouldn't be as afraid for Nash leaving after the season because they'd still have Collison.

With a potential trove of cap space next summer for Deron Williams or Dwight Howard, Dallas is taking the long-view and passing on this season. However, that means Nash's expiring contract would fit right into their plans and they have someone with a similar contract also at the point guard position: Jason Kidd. With the intriguing Roddy Beaubois, Phoenix would receive a young player to help bridge the team to the next generation. Teaming up Nash and Nowitzki, of course, is the motivating factor. If Nash leaves Phoenix, I don't think there's a place where he'd be more comfortable.

The other city I believe contends with Dallas for swooning his heart is Portland. Steve grew up in the Pacific Northwest and would love a city known for its natural food culture, its biking, its love of soccer, and their rapid Blazers fanbase. Playing better than their record indicates by how much they're outscoring opponents, Portland got off to a great start despite poor shooting from Felton and a center combination 76 years old. They're also one of the fastest teams in the league with Gerald Wallace, Wesley Matthews, Batum, and Alridge running in transition. It's a team built for Nash, who would have great fun in throwing alley-oops to Aldridge or using him in pick and pop.

Who would be traded for Nash? The common answer is that the Suns would demand Batum, the promising 23 year old forward, and fans shoot down the idea at giving away Batum. However, at Steve's age with a rental contract, some say a package involving Felton and a young player like Elliot Williams would be enough. Even if that's how people view Nash right now, I think that's severely underestimating his impact. He's lost little to age and remains an amazing passer and shooter, and despite concerns about his defense it's really not atrocious as some claim. There's also evidence that he's still one of the best players in the league and can completely change a team offensively.

One way of estimating value is using statistical techniques on how teams play when a player is on the court versus off the court. Nash has been consistently excellent the past half decade hovering around +5 to +6 points per 100 possessions with a rotating cast of teammates and approaching 40. People may not care for plus/minus statistics or other advanced metrics, but the evidence is pretty overwhelming that he's still a game-changing player offensively. He's hasn't slipped yet either -- he's still shooting as well as he has before with a higher number of assists, and he keeps himself in great shape. His low per minutes a game is keeping his numbers down, but in the playoffs when it matters that can be increased.

With how Felton's playing, it's not unreasonable to assume Nash would be an upgrade of +5 or more from the above link for the Blazers. How much does that help them? A common method of predicting wins is the Pythagorean method, which uses offensive and defensive efficiency. Portland this season has an offensive rating of 100.7 and defensive 96.2. Their predicted winning percentage is 68%, about ten points lower than where they're at now. They do, however, have the greatest point differential in the western conference. How would Nash change the team? Given that he's playing 31 minutes a game, let's say he adds +3.2 to their offense. This puts their predicted winning percentage at 78%, better than anyone in the league, and it would project to 64 wins in an 82 game season.

I will admit that I don't trust that result, and partly it's because it doesn't include the effect of switching Felton and Nash's defense as well as whoever else is traded. I did, however, use a conservative estimate of Nash's offensive impact and ignored getting rid of Felton's terrible shooting, which is an aberration and should clear itself soon. Even with adding a -1 penalty to their defensive, they would still have a predicted winning percentage of 75%, which would be near the best in the league. With how well Nash's teams have performed over the years, I'm confident that those results are actually achievable, and they could be applied to other teams in the league. Who wouldn't be helped by an extremely efficient shooter and an astounding passer?

My favorite Nash trade? Nash and Robin Lopez for Felton, Batum, and Chris Johnson. Suns get a solid point guard nearly a decade younger in return and valuable young player Batum along with a prospect in Chris Johnson, a lanky, long-armed big guy, while Portland gets Nash to run the offense and a decent center who's young enough to not have served in Korea. I'd even be willing to throw in a draft pick.With how much others have said Nash can net the Suns in return, this is perhaps the best offer they could get.

To Blazers fans who say giving up Batum is too much: the common mistake in managing a team is overvaluing role players you've watched blossom on the team. Batum is certainly a nice player, but there's little chance he'll be a game changer. Players at Batum's level are easy to find; Steve Nash caliber guys are not. Roll the dice. Take the gamble. Felton and Batum will not win a championship, but Nash can at least give the Blazers an exciting season to recover from the dark cloud of Roy and Oden and a likely deep playoff run. With the Lakers in shambles and Oklahoma City still very young, strike now. Waiting is not for basketball.

Sunday, December 25, 2011

2011-2012 Western Conference Preview

PACIFIC DIVISION




Golden State Warriors

I would argue that a compressed schedule will help an up-tempo team, but the new coach Mark Jackson has vowed to remake them into a defensive team. I’m not sure how he can do that, short of trading Stephen Curry, Monta Ellis and David Lee for Dwight Howard and a good wing defender. Like their neighbors in Sacramento, the roster is a mess of weird players. Curry is arguably the best young shooter in the league and led all pros in free-throw percentage at 93%. Dorell Wright turned out to be the kind of wing player Miami wanted and led the league in three point makes; he’s also one of the few Warriors competent at defense. Biedrins was a promising center who is more a joke now, but reports indicate his dedication is back. Udoh could end up averaging two blocks a game off the bench in 24 minutes.

Unfortunately, the organization is known for letting its talent either escape or wither. They have a knack for finding D-league players, but Reggie Williams left for the Bobcats and Brandon “Second All-time in Three-Point Percentage” Morrow went to the Nets.  The new owners don’t appear to be the saviors of the Bay Area, and they are doomed to another season of pain.

I don’t have much to write about the Warriors, which is really quite sad. Their acquisition of Kwame Brown and signing him for seven million dollars is all you need to say. Thankfully, it’s for only one year, but coach Mark Jackson will play him huge minutes because his large body incorrectly implies great defense. The best move forward for the team is to trade Ellis for a delusional GM in exchange for first round picks and young player(s). The odds of that happening are low, despite how obviously horrible a backcourt of Curry and Ellis is.

Prediction: 29-37
Random prediction: Biedrins will average double digits in rebounding for the second time in his career but will fail to eclipse the same mark in points.

LA Lakers

The salary dump: the NBA’s karma cuts both ways. The Lakers were lucky to steal Pau Gasol when Memphis decided he was too expensive (or at least that’s what they claim; I think someone was drunk and made the wrong phone call.) Then LA dumped Odom when the luxury tax became too punitive. It has to be one of the strangest and most lopsided moves, however. One, the Lakers make a ton of money from huge TV deals and a national brand; was he really too expensive? Two, did they have to trade him to a contender, especially in the west? I’m sure there are many teams who would want Odom. Three, they didn’t even get anything back from the trade – a draft pick that’s effectively nothing. They couldn’t get a one-year rental on someone? A real draft pick? The rights to a good international player? And lastly, they took themselves out from serious championship contention at a time when their window with Kobe Bryant as a star is likely closing. They don’t have any frontcourt depth and had to sign Josh McBobs to avoid playing Luke Walton serious minutes.

The Lakers suddenly have a gloomy future, as least for them. They could be bailed out by a big free agent signing, but Kobe’s stupidly large contract will make that more difficult. He will be paid 27 million next year and 30 million in two years. Depending on how revenues change in the future, that could be nearly half the way to the luxury tax. I don’t think even the most strident Laker fan can argue he will be worth that much money in 2014 and -15; the only practical defense is from a marketing perspective. I’m especially skeptical because I think he’s one of the league’s most overrated players in recent history. Yes, he’s good, but he’s been a consistent all-star instead of being absolutely dominant like O’Neal, Jordan or even LeBron James. That’s another argument for another day, but basically his albatross of a contract and their newfound reluctance to pay heavy tolls in luxury tax will be their undoing.

The lone bright spot for the Lakers is Bynum, and any basketball fan knows why that’s a terrible kind of hope. It’s like they’re waiting for Godot: the Bynum that reigns on high over all western centers has not arrived; instead they have an injury prone big man. I’ll agree that his potential is as high as any big man – he’s a legitimate seven feet tall, and maybe taller, he rebounds and picks up blocks better than most, he has flashes of brilliance where he completely owns the paint, he’s a competent free-throw shooter for his size, and he just has that feel for that game that so many centers lack, like his knack for passing that’s been underutilized as soon as he realized he was unlikely to get the ball back from Kobe. For the sake of the game, I hope he has a full season and makes the all-star team, but the chances are as small as space on the LA freeways at rush hour.

The Lakers were slipping last season, and without their sixth man their fall will accelerate. As the most entitled team in the league, they have less to worry about than most because they can be bailed out as they have in the past like getting Shaq. The grind of the densely packed season will knock a few wins off their mark, as they have the greatest drop-off of talent from their top guys to the rest of the cast this side of the Celtics. As a Blazers fan, I will enjoy this season.

Prediction: 37-29

Random prediction: Josh McRoberts will become an instant Laker fan favorite with his powerful dunks.

LA Clippers

Fan reaction to the rejected LA-Houston-New Orleans trade was apoplectic. It’s fun to hate the man in charge, David Stern, but the trade only made basketball sense to the Rockets. Chris Paul would have been wasted on the Lakers, watching Kobe Bryant play one-on-one and take fade-away jumper after fade-away jumper. The Hornets would be stupid to rebuild post-Chris Paul with two power forwards in their early 30’s and the defensively flammable Kevin Martin, who’s not too young himself. Instead we have Chris Paul on a Clippers team with Blake Griffin and DeAndre Jordan, who surprisingly led the league in dunks last year on a per possession basis. (Howard led in total dunks with the Clippers tandem following in alphabetical order.) That is a gift for every basketball fan.  I’m not sure what the record is for alley-oops thrown in a single season, but Chris Paul will probably break it even in a short season given he stays healthy. Andre Miller may have that record from last year when he connected with Aldridge so many times that it became a boring but effective play.

I’m not sure why they didn’t include Eric Bledsoe in the trade given that the Hornets would be lacking at that position and the Clippers already had Mo Williams and Billups to go along with Chris Paul. Hopefully Mo Williams will be moved for a shooting guard so Bledsoe doesn’t get buried on the bench. Billups has always been a combo guard and never put up impressive assist numbers, and his outside shooting will be the perfect complement to the Chris Paul and Blake show. I derided the Butler signing in another post, but his spot-up shooting will be put to use. I would have been relatively okay with his signing if it had come after the trade because the Clippers weren’t going to compete before the trade and the veteran would have simply taken time away from their developing youngsters.

In the playoffs, the Clippers will face problems when other teams exploit their weaknesses. One right now is perimeter defense, where Butler is coming off a major knee injury and Billups and Williams are combustible. Chris Paul can defend well in most situations and will probably lead everyone in steals again, but they’ll need to be able to stop bigger wings too. Eric Bledsoe may actually be pressed into that role against shooting guards; they obviously need more help. Someone like Ginobili could destroy the team. Their lack of frontcourt depth is another problem. Behind Blake and Jordan they have basically nothing but marginal players. Memphis, in particular, would plow through them. If they were a smarter team, they’d sign someone like Fes, Utah’s foreign exchange student who specializes in owning the paint defensively and collecting rebounds, and use him when needed. They don’t need to hit a home run; they just need to find a quality bench player who preferably has room to improve. Think of the opposite strategy Miami has with its centers.

Although I attempted, the Clippers’ season is hard to predict. They don’t feel like a complete team and will likely add a couple new players. Depending on who they get and who they lose, they can either be a merely exciting playoff team or a contender. Their success also depends on how Blake Griffin and DeAndre Jordan develop defensively, as both were disappointing given their athleticism and size. However, the main reason I’m lukewarm on them this season is that they hired Vinny Del Negro as their head coach and Donald Sterling still owns the organization. Those are not the two guys you want leading your team.

Prediction: 43-23

Random prediction: Chris Paul will break the single season alley-oop record, which someone like the Elias Sports Bureau will uncover after many Griffin-Jordan dunks.

Phoenix Suns

This team needs to be blown up with some nitroglycerin. They will not compete with this version of the Nash Suns. Stoudemire, Joe Johnson, Barbosa, Jason Richardson, Boris Diaw, and Shawn Marion are gone. It’s time to move on. I’m sorry, but it is. Nash, Grant Hill and Gortat can’t beat the Bulls, Heat, or the Clippers. They have a few good young players, but now it’s their opportunity to get back as much value as they can for their productive veterans before they retire.

I’m afraid the season will pass, they’ll make no major trades, and miss the playoffs with a record that ensures a middling draft pick. They made no moves to visibly improve, and Aaron Brooks will be trapped in China for a while. As Gortat and other young players will improve, Nash and the other veterans will likely decline. They need a miracle to be one of the top-four teams in the western conference this year or next, and with a ton of cap space next year they could make a run into free agency. I’m not sure if Dwight Howard or Deron Williams want to play in Arizona, and I believe they used their miracle already when they signed Steve Nash after his exit from Dallas and he decided to improve his game after he turned 30.

I understand that it’s hard to let go. Nash and Phoenix fans have a lot of good memories. They took the league by storm and helped usher in a faster pace and more scoring. They had heartbreaking playoff defeats, but they would return the next year and threaten the history books with a run at the greatest offensive team of all time title. Sure, they had missteps, like the Big Cactus Shaq experiment, but many teams would trade for their success in the last decade. Phoenix and Nash are at different paths in their lives right now, and it would be best for both parties if he left before he hits free agency next year.

Prediction: 30-36

Random prediction: Steve Nash will be contacted by Michelle Obama to help her campaign of healthy eating in the US.

Sacramento Kings

The Kings definitely have talent, but it’s unclear if that talent can be harnessed into real basketball games. Tyreke Evans is the type of slashing shooting guard, strangely pressed into the role of point guard despite a 6’ 6” solid frame with passing skills lacking, who could one day make an all-star team with his high scoring average and decent peripherals like rebounds. He also has a lot of potential defensively, but it will be hard to cultivate those skills on a team like Sacramento. DeMarcus Cousins is in the mold of Rasheed Wallace or Zach Randolph: precociously talented low-post scorers with a wide array of skills unfortunately coupled with what coaches call attitude problems. The highly touted centers who have failed their potential have done so either because they actually possessed no talent besides height (Darko, Kwame Brown) or injuries destroyed their physical gifts (Greg Oden, with Andrew Bynum on the cusp.) It’s hard to imagine someone with his skill and size not making at least one all-star team.

While the west coast has seen a lot of player movement, the Kings have made a series of small moves that have been terrible to middling except for attempting to sign defensive ace Chuck Hayes, who as it turns out to recent reports will sign with the team after another NBA cardiac scare. Aldridge has been out of commission a while after another problem with his Wolff-Parkinson-White disorder and Jeff Green is gone for the season after heart surgery for an aortic aneurysm. The fans will likely latch onto Jimmer and his potential as the Mormon Ben Gordon. He has the size of a point guard but is at least a combo guard, and may actually be the best backcourt mate for Evans as they complement each other well: Evans can handle the bigger guards and the tougher match-ups, and Jimmer can spread the floor for Evans’ drives to the basket.

The roster is a reasonably interesting mishmash of players, but none are imposing. They have Marcus Thornton, a bench scorer who could be usurped by Jimmer. John “No, Not Pronounced as that Fish” Salmons is an over-the-hill wing player who relies on his athleticism. Travis Outlaw wasn’t good enough for the New Jersey Nets, and plays better as a 4 but will get few opportunities there. JJ Hickson had his field-goal percentage plunge roughly ten percent last season. The team also has no real point guard, mostly because they are insistent that Tyreke Evans is a point.  I’m not sure when management will finally realize this, but until they do the Kings will remain the worst passing team in the league. The rookie Isaiah Thomas is a letter and a couple inches in height away from helping in this regard.

As a last note, a team still in rebuilding mode suffers through a paradox: to become good you need star players, preferably young, but when your upside bubbles to the surface as real NBA skill you lose better chances to draft those young stars. The Kings will continue to improve, but they have to consider how far their rising ship will ascend. Will the Evans-Cousins team become first round fodder that eventually fades back into the lottery, or can they at least have the success of the Webber-Stojakovic Kings?

Prediction: 22-44

Random prediction: Cousins will have a game with six turnovers, six missed shots, and six fouls.



NORTHWEST DIVISION



Denver Nuggets

Before Carmelo Anthony left for New York, I commented on how Denver was an amazing offensive team despite Carmelo’s mediocre efficiency. They traded him for a handful of players, one of them Gallinari who’s an Italian small forward who’s a great three point shooter and surprisingly shot six free throws for every ten field goals, leading all small forwards including Anthony. Defensively he’s in some ways an upgrade because Anthony was too much of a star to exert much effort there. What happened after the trade is that Denver improved, and this season even with a couple players trapped behind enemy lines in China their depth will serve them well among all the back-to-back-to-back’s. I don’t think they could beat Chicago or Miami in the finals, but they are a dark horse candidate this year despite not having a recognizable star.

The Mavericks made the mistake of giving up Rudy Fernandez for nothing so they could play a decrepit Vince Carter more minutes, and as a Portland fan I can’t wait to see how they use him in Denver, where they hope to push the tempo and fire away. He could be used alongside Andre Miller, as Rudy is strangely great at defending point guards. It’s probably because of his weight, and Rudy and Corey Brewer are possibly the lightest shooting guard duo per vertical inch in NBA history at 185 and 188 lbs, respectively, with listed heights of 6’ 6” and 6’ 9”. They also have Afflalo, who they decided to sign for 8.6 million a year. I guess Bill Simmons was his agent this year, because I have no clue why people think he’s so good. There is no evidence he’s a defensive ace (his defensive plus/minus numbers are disappointing, and few serious scouts see him as one.) It would be best for the team if they flipped him for a frontcourt player, as Nene will have a lonely season in the paint with the Birdman Chris Anderson and Timofey Mozgoz the other notable big guys.

If this is the Nuggets’ year to shine, then draft pick Kenneth Faried will be less Reggie Evans and more Jeff Foster, an underrated frontcourt player who can control the glass and protect the rim. He will without a doubt rebound, but it remains to be seen if the rest of his game is polished enough to be a helpful rotation player. The Nene contract was too large, but it was likely either overpay him or get nothing in return, the Sophie’s choice every team has to make with their stars. He’s a great scorer, but his rebounding moves him a notch below the elite frontcourt players of the NBA.

The point guard position will be fun to watch with the speedy Ty Lawson likely starting; hopefully he can shoot more will maintaining his stellar percentages. Andre Miller will have another strangely healthy season where he shakes off his bad conditioning habits to pass four players to the tenth position on the all-time assists leaderboard. Some people are surprised he hasn’t fallen off a cliff yet productivity wise given that he’s a point guard who lacks a good jump shot, but that’s mistaking the most common strategy for the mechanism: what helps players age gracefully is a low-impactful playing style, and for guards the most common one is a shooting touch, but Andre has a crafty post game where he abuses smaller guards and is one of the best passers in the game, skills that don’t erode with time like speed. He can’t jump, but that’s maybe way his knees have held up so well because he can’t even leap high enough to put significant stress in his legs.

The Nuggets will be one of my favorite teams to watch, and they have a chance to post the top record in the west despite not having any players who were all-stars previously. If they are at the top or near, I imagine Nene or maybe Gallinari will make the all-star team because the media will be retroactively explaining how the no-stars Nuggets became one of the best in the west. With only one hole where Kenyon Martin played, Denver will use its depth to storm the lockout shortened season.

Prediction: 45-21

Random prediction: Nene will be an all-star because the coaches and the media will need to justify Denver’s record.

Minnesota Timberwolves

I’m not sure what to make of this team. Will they ascend, finally buoyant enough after years in the lottery with a full cache of young talent? Kevin Love had a break-through season, but that wasn’t enough to win more than 17 games. His teammates were terrible, but most of them are still there and I know they’ll find a way to play Darko 25 minutes a game despite his poor skills in the game of basketball. They have who could be the best player of his draft class in Derrick Williams, but it’s crowded at the forward positions. They’re adding Rubio, but his shooting prowess is Rondo-eque, and they decided to pay an extremely short shooting guard nearly 20 million dollars. The silver lining – Rubio is almost a Rondo clone because of his defense and passing skills, which are superior, and Rondo is an all-star who has a championship; Barea and Rubio can play together in the second unit where the Spanish phenom is big enough to check 2’s.

In a crowded west with dying giants like the Lakers and Spurs, Minnesota could be posed to compete at the right time. The emphasis is on “could,” because for all we know Kahn will trade Love and Anthony Randolph for a rental of Deron Williams. I don’t think this will be the season where they approach 0.500 basketball when so many of their young players are still learning how to play and Kevin Love’s unusual combination of 15 rebounds and 40% three-point shooting wasn’t enough to pull them out of the cellar. I’m not even sure how he could improve, but apparently he’s in the best shape of his life. Hopefully that will translate into better pick and roll defense and more blocked shots. He could be devastating as a center because of his three-point range, making opposing big guys leave the paint. If Anthony Randolph turns out to be the next coming of Marcus Camby with his rebounding, shot-blocking and surprising ball skills, those two would end up being one of the top frontcourts in the league.

With Rubio’s lack of shooting touch and Love’s defensive deficiencies, it’s a team that needs careful roster management with the right personnel to complement the best players. Kidd and Terry work well together because Terry can check opposing point guards while Kidd is big and smart enough to defend 2’s well. Minnesota will need the same strategy for Rubio. I don’t think the team will make the correct choices and could waste a few talented players like they did with Kevin Garnett. It’s unfortunate because Kevin Love, Ricky Rubio, Anthony Randolph, and Michael Beasley have a lot of potential, and the team has a history of sticking with bad management (the Kevin McHale era.) It’s a loaded draft next year, and if they’re lucky they’ll be bad enough this year to land their missing piece.

Prediction: 25-41

Random prediction: Rubio will have a game with ten rebounds, ten assists, and zero made field goals.

Oklahoma City Thunder

The Thunder were the youngest team last year weighted by each player’s minutes. The majority of the team is under 25 years old, and a calendar year can make a world of difference to their abilities. Last year Westbrook took the leap, although not in an optimal way: he ended up shooting more than Durant per possession, even though the latter was a more effective scorer. The last point is related to Durant’s problem of freeing himself up for a shot, but part of the blame rests on Westbrook’s itchy trigger finger and mediocre skills at setting guys up. Durant expanding his game would certainly help his team, but he’s already doing more than enough and the other players need to improve. They’re one of the youngest contenders in league history, and during a weird season they could reach the finals.

As far as the future is concerned, Oklahoma City is set up as well as any other team with Durant and Westbrook signed to long-term deals along with the “elder” sage Nick Collison (only 31) and Thabo Sefolosha. Their two most important role players, however, are Ibaka, who could use his athleticism and length to become one of the best defenders in the league (he’s not there yet despite his impressive block totals,) and Harden, already a sharp-shooting guard who can complement the duo of Durant and Westbrook. They don’t have depth like the Pacers or Nuggets do, but they have enough different weapons after pilfering the Celtics in a trade to get Perkins that they can match up well with nearly any team. The only piece they’re arguably lacking is a major perimeter stopper; Sefolosha is great but not first-team great and his offense is terrible, which stops him from racking up major minutes. Their new post defender Perkins will be interesting to watch this year, as he lost over 30 lbs and some worry that he won’t be able to defend Howard anymore, but basketball players rarely lose anything from dropping weight unless they’re rail thin.

With the Lakers faltering, the Spurs still quietly good but likely to rest their veterans, and the Mavericks as old any team, the Thunder are poised to take the western title crown. Some pundits hesitate to give them credit because of their age, but basketball is about simply outscoring the opponent. In actuality, their age is what will help them this year as they will improve while the older teams get worse, especially with the compacted schedule. I’m not guaranteeing that Oklahoma will finish with the best record in the west because of how closely competitive the top teams are, but I think they have the best chance.

Prediction: 46-20

Random prediction: Ibaka will lead the league in blocks per game with close to 3.5 and will receive heavy consideration for Defensive Player of the Year, even if he isn’t deserving.

Portland Trailblazers

(Important note: I’m a Blazers fan, and may believe in them too strongly but will try to remain objective.)

The Blazers were very good even with little production from Roy and Oden, so it shouldn’t be a surprise this year if they’re very good again. Roy played 1310 minutes of subpar basketball while Oden didn’t even get a single minute. Oden, in particular, was the dark horse for the Blazers. If he were to put together a relatively healthy season at the quality of basketball he’s shown, Portland could contend with any western team. He’s shown that he’s an elite rebounder with a rebound percentage above 20, which is impressive for even bench guys who only concentrate on that. He blocked 2.3 shots a game two years ago in only 24 minutes. His offensive game, while rough, was still very effective in a Dwight Howard bulldozing through the opposite sort of way. However, the difference with Oden is that he’s a great free-throw shooter clearing 70%, and consequently his true-shooting percentage was 65 in limited minutes last year and the season before 60. That’s enough lamenting about what could have been; this Blazer team still has a lot of talent.

The Blazers have a varied and multi-faceted attack. Andre Miller is gone, and in his place is Felton, a capable ball-handler, a decent outside shooter (Miller was a terrible long-range shooter and left the paint clogged too often,) and a good defender who’s a few years younger. Wesley Matthews is a good defender, though not great, but he’s at 40% for his career beyond the three-point line and can bully his way into the lane and draw fouls. Gerald “Crash” Wallace is still a nightmare on weak-side defense, and finishes at the rim enough to justify his weak outside shooting. Batum slumped on his percentages after a stellar rookie year, and strangely has terrible +/- defensive numbers, but he’s young with arms like Inspector Gadget and can team with Wallace in a small-ball forward line-up that can destroy others in transition. Aldridge is a big man with a soft touch from outside, and is underrated on the defensive end. His ability to play huge minutes at power forward and center will help the Blazers, who are lacking in frontcourt depth. They also added sixth man Crawford, who will replace a lot of the scoring that Roy left behind. It’s a versatile team that, like many NBA franchises, are only missing a decent center, as Camby closer to 40 than 30 years old.

I would be more confident with the rotation if they had added more than Craig Smith and Kurt Thomas to the frontcourt. Smith, “The Rhino,” will be fun to watch, but his use should not be extended to heavy minutes. At this point in his career, Kurt Thomas is a third-string center, but I imagine he’ll be the first big off the bench most nights and even start, because coaches have a soft spot for veterans. If Portland had a good GM, like they did recently with Kevin Pritchard or Rich Cho, they could have found a bigger steal than Craig Smith, but they’re operating with an interim general manager and I can’t imagine they’ll get healthy interest for the job after coldly dumping Pritchard but making him run their draft after he was fired, or axing Cho even if he was the most qualified for the job because Paul Allen didn’t get along with him (I can’t think of anyone who would, honestly.)

I imagine this year will be a pleasant surprise for Blazers fans, because their varied depth at least in positions 1 through 4 will do well in a compressed schedule, and the lack of a dominating western team at the top two or three seeds could lead to an upset and a second round visit for Portland -- yes, the Thunder, Mavericks, etc. are still good, but not overwhelmingly so. Next year Camby and Felton come off their contracts, and Roy’s huge deal is voided. The only long-term contracts are for Aldridge and Matthews, and they should have a huge amount of cap space even without Gerald Wallace opting out of his last year ($11.4 million.) I don’t think Howard will come to Portland, but if he did the Aldridge-Howard-Wallace/Batum frontcourt would immediately become one of the most imposing in the league. I can dream, but the Blazers will probably get a couple decent free agents if Paul Allen doesn’t find a way to destroy the management even further.

Prediction: 38-28

Random prediction: Crawford for sixth man of the year.

Utah Jazz

Utah post-Jerry Sloan has been largely forgettable. They are without their all-stars Deron Williams and Boozer, and Malone and Stockton are only memories. They have a frontcourt that’s impressive on the surface, but in reality it’s too cluttered and using both Jefferson and Millsap in heavy minutes is defensively irresponsible. They have intriguing young players who have yet to realize their potential. In other words, they’re a mediocre team in the middle of a rebuilding project.

Replacing Deron Williams is next to impossible. Devis Harris used to be an exciting young point guard who was quietly a defensive ace, but after some time in the backwoods of the New Jersey Nets he forgot how to defend and concentrated on scoring. As for other star power, Al Jefferson is supposed to be their superstar, but after years and various injuries it’s more likely he’s something the Jazz don’t want to admit – a high volume, middling efficiency scorer who destroys any value he has with poor defense.  However, their next generation is promising. Derrick Favors has the athleticism that sends Dwight Howard or Kevin Garnett to the top of the draft, but also the kind reminiscent of disappointing studs like Tyrus Thomas and Shawn Kemp. Their future largely depends on him.

For this season, I’d recommend shipping out some of their aging assets before they lose more value, and at least one of the Millsap and Jefferson pair. It’s nearly impossible to get matching value back in a deal, but right now those players are taking playing time away from their younger guys who are arguably more effective and at their best keeping the Jazz from better lottery picks. They’re not going to contend with this crew, and they could bottom out this year depending on who they move and how guys like Hayward and Kanter progress.

Prediction: 26-40

Random prediction: Enes Kanter will be a bust.



SOUTHWEST DIVISION



Dallas Mavericks

After winning a title and essentially trading Chandler for Odom, the Mavericks are once again neglected in the media. They’ll miss having a good defensive center, but an Odom-Nowitzki frontcourt will be devastating offensively and they will have cap room next year. This season won’t be a terrible title defense like Miami’s last one, but they’re not out for blood like Boston was. They have enough depth to weather the weird schedule, and will likely play small line-ups whenever the match-ups allow them to unless they pick up a decent center. However, I wouldn’t be surprised if they force a center into their starting line-up because they’ll worry not having one will drag them down, but in fact playing a subpar player of any position will have the effect they’re trying to avoid.

The success of Dallas is hinged on the amazing offensive play of Dirk Nowitzki, a consistently efficient scorer who’s a match-up nightmare as a seven-foot jump shooter who can take fellow seven-footers off the dribble. He sets up in the middle of the floor, making double teams dangerous as the floor opens up, and Dallas has always surrounded him with shooters. This year is no exception – Kidd, Terry, Carter, Roddy, even Odom, and new arrival Delonte West are great from long-range. Dirk shouldn’t slip too much due to age; his playing style is built for low impact on the body and his shooting skills and huge frame won’t deteriorate as he goes further into his 30’s. The problem with the Carter signing, however, is that Dallas traded a first round pick for Rudy Fernandez, and then traded Rudy to clear space for Carter. Right now, Vince Carter is not significantly better than Rudy, who’s eight years younger. Rudy’s even a better dunker presently.

Dirk has been great for over a decade with alarming consistency, meaning his supporting cast will make or break this season, as it’s been for every season. Roddy Beaubois is their x-factor, but one should also watch Brandon Wright, who has shown huge potential but never stuck the landing while playing in Golden State and New Jersey. With Kidd’s ability to guard shooting guards, Roddy can forget about feigning interest as a point guard and attack the basket.  Vince Carter will probably end up being a mistake because he’s a guard who’s relied on his athleticism all his life and is in his mid-thirties. If you lower your expectations and think of him only as a spot-up shooter from deep, then he should attain success. Aging shooting guards like Michael Finley and Jerry Stackhouse had to make similar sacrifices to keep playing in the NBA.

I’m not down on Dallas’ chances, but the west is loaded with teams who are “weak” contenders, and both the Heat and Bulls should be better. I’m afraid Dallas won’t be able to find another decent center, and will by habit start the next best center they have, Brendan Haywood, even when going up against opponents who don’t have a big center worth guarding. They’ll drop a spot in the standings because of this, but when they play without a useless big man like Haywood or Mahinmi they’ll be as good as last year.

Prediction: 42-24

Random prediction: Mark Cuban will make negative public comments about Kim Kardashian, and it will be funny.

Houston Rockets

Houston could have had a Nene-Gasol frontcourt with a bevy of nice role players surrounding them. Instead they’re a near 0.500 team too good for a high lottery pick and too bad for a playoff run. The organization’s skill at finding bargains and talent has put them in this precarious position. Attempting to move Kevin Martin and Luis Scola was the right thing to do, as Kevin is terrible defensively and Scola is a smallish power forward in his early 30’s.

This is a hard team to predict because they could make a major trade during the season. I think they’ll be patient, however, and could do something smart like play Kevin Martin heavy minutes to showcase his scoring and increase his trade value. They have plenty of assets, and it’s only a matter of time before the shrewd organization lands a superstar. It’s not like Houston is in the far-flung backwoods in Montana. In terms of their wealth on the wings, they have the underrated Lowry, a bulldog point guard, and the former volleyball player Chase Budinger who will start at SF while making under $900,000 this year. Courtney Lee is the exact kind of role player so many great teams covet – a defensive plus shooting guard who shoots around 40% from three’s.

The Samuel Dalembert signing, however, is vexing in terms of a long-term strategy, but is logical when looking at the short view. He’s a center who will control the boards and rack up blocked shots and was one of the most coveted free agents. I’m not sure why he didn’t sign with Miami – well, not exactly, because it was about money – as he would have been a Haitian hero and might have won a championship. Rounding out their frontcourt rotation, Patrick Patterson had a solid rookie season, and he’ll platoon with Jordan Hill as two young power forwards who appear to be good rotation players. They have tallest player in the league still with Hasheem Thabeet, but he appears to be a bust. Lastly, Scola’s post game is always a pure basketball joy to watch, and the Argentine be following his best pro season yet.

The media are not thinking highly of Houston right now since they’re in basketball purgatory relegated to first round exits or barely missing the playoffs, but I’d rather have an organization that can find and manage talent than one that’s so horribly run they eventually pick up a mass of talented young players, like Minnesota. I wish a major free agent expressed interest in playing in Houston, because they have the tradition of Olajuwon and smart management who won’t make mistakes like signing Glen Davis for $20 million or trading Gortat for Turkoglu. They won’t make the playoffs, but they’ll be one of the most active teams in the trade market.

Prediction: 31-35

Random prediction: They’ll wait until the summer of 2012 to make a big splash in the trade and free agent market

Memphis Grizzlies

After a surprising run in the playoffs, the Grizzlies still have a lot to prove. They remain intact, yet they’re in a competitive conference where only a few games will separate first from eighth. The least “western” team in the conference, they’ve been largely forgotten the franchise’s entire life, and even after a Cinderella run beating some of the best teams in the west they’re not receiving much ink. Also, at what point can Utah and Memphis trade names? Does a second-round pick have to be included?

Thankfully, they’ll have Rudy Gay back, who made a stronger commitment to defense and less of one to bad shots. Zach Randolph is in the best shape of his life working out with a new trainer. Tony Allen will get a full season to show how he’s the best perimeter defender in the game. They have one of the best starting five’s in the game with the weak link being Mike Conley, a speedy young point guard who’s accurate from long-distance. Their depth, especially after losing Darrell Arthur to injury, will push them out of a comfortable playoff seed. Hamed Haddadi was fun to watch in garbage minutes, but the Iranian giant should be used sparingly, not as one of the first big men off the bench.

Unfortunately, depth and a stacked western conference will keep them from the top spot, but in the playoffs they could again plow through opponents with a frontcourt of Randolph and Gasol. There may actually be a lot of upsets in the playoffs because this regular season more than most aids deep teams, but in the playoffs you can run your best guys huge minutes. They’ll have a quiet season, and could knock off someone like Denver or even Oklahoma City in the first round.

Prediction: 36-30

Random prediction: Rudy Gay will make his first all-star team and could cement his status as one of the go-to forwards for the game now that Carmelo is in New York.

New Orleans Hornets

I don’t want to talk anymore about the trade that almost was, but getting Gordon and Minnesota’s pick is a much better deal. Some media argue that just letting a guy go is the better strategy (i.e. getting nothing) so you can bottom out and get one of the top picks, but this way they have two nice picks in the next draft and a guy who’s already a great young player. The Chris Paul era is official over, and it’s not because they’re a small market; it’s because they made bad decisions in surrounding the point guard with a cast devoid of talent

Even David West left, and the remainder of the team is assorted flotsam and jetsam. Trevor Ariza likes to pretend he’s an outside shooter even with some of the worst percentages in the game. Jarrett Jack is now their starting point guard, but he can barely play the position and would be a shooting guard if he was a couple inches taller. Carl Landry is still an effective player, but as a small power forward he’s going to use the rest of his prime on a lottery team in rebuilding mode. The most interesting part of the team is that they have one of the best center tandems in the game. Both 29 years old, Okafor and Kaman are both great defenders and excellent rebounders with rudimentary post skills. I would expect Kaman and his expiring contract will be traded to a contender, or maybe a playoff bound team looking for a one-year rental so they can stay active in next season’s free agent market.

As with too many teams, this season the Hornets are playing for the ping-pongs balls of the NBA draft. It’s an unfortunate time to try to sell the team, and if they get the number one or two spot in the draft David Stern will come under even more fire. Their bright spot this year is that Eric Gordon has a chance to make the all-star team if he continues to improve and uses the freedom from his subpar cast to raise his scoring average.

Prediction: 18-48

Random Prediction:  Eric Gordon sneaks onto the all-star team despite paltry team record since Deron Williams and Carmelo Anthony defected to the eastern seaboard. David West also left, eliminating another competitor for the 12th man.

San Antonio Spurs

Last season is like a distant memory after the lock-out, but the Spurs finished with the best record in the west and were only one game behind the leaders in the east, the Bulls. I don’t expect them to repeat their success when the compressed schedule will cause Popovich to rest his aging veterans to even more extreme lengths. I think they’ll be content to cruise to a four-seed and unleash hell in the playoffs.

The Spurs have made no major moves, and when one considers their record last season it’s hard to fault them. Every year people expect them to finally slip, but they have yet to do so. In fact, they won the championship the year of the last lockout, and Duncan has stayed with the team since them and the team has been a contender virtually every year since then. The biggest change this year will be a heavier use of Tiago Splitter, the coveted Brazilian big man who finally played last year in limited minutes. His problem is a lack of a midrange jump shot that most Spurs big men must possess if they want to share time with Tim Duncan. With McDyess gone and DeJuan Blair still missing his ACLs, Tiago “Log” Splitter will probably average 20 to 25 minutes. The Spurs may improve if he takes some minutes from Blair, who has conditioning problems and plays terrible defense. James Anderson, who missed most of last year with a foot injury as a rookie, will also contribute, and has shown he has NBA range. Additionally, with the keen eye for talent the Spurs have they may have found a diamond in the rough with Kawhi Leonard, a Shawn Marion type who can rebound like a power forward and finishes at the rim well.

Tony Parker is still in his 20’s and Ginobili is aging well, while Duncan is gracefully reducing his role, and as a result the Spurs are still one of the top teams in the NBA. Tim Duncan’s large contract ends this season, and with the power of the amnesty -- Richard Jefferson next year, most likely -- they could retool with a big free agent signing. Marquee guys have shown an inclination to flock to big, warm cities, which is unfortunate because few are well run. Guys spend most of the season travelling to other cities, and they can live where they want in the off-season, so I don’t see the need to live on a warm beach. I thought they would value good basketball, but maybe I’m naïve. Whatever happens, don’t bet against the Spurs, an organization that deserves its championships. From one lock-out to another 12 years later, they have sustained excellence like no other team. Their last season below a 50 win pace in 82 games was in 1996-97. If you adjust the shortened lockout season of ‘99 to 82 games Tim Duncan has never known a season worse than 50 wins, and this year will be one more.

Prediction: 42-24

Random prediction: The Spurs will have another rookie or related player from out of nowhere who will be a steal, most likely Kawhi Leonard.